If you consider using this scheme you want to have a very big amount of cash and remarkable fortitude to march away when you accrue a small success. For the purposes of this essay, a sample buy in of two thousand dollars is used.

The Horn Bet numbers are certainly not considered the "winning way to wager" and the horn bet itself has a house advantage well over twelve percent.

All you are playing is $5 on the pass line and ONE number from the horn. It does not matter if it is a "craps" or "yo" as long as you play it constantly. The Yo is more popular with players using this approach for clear reasons.

Buy in for two thousand dollars when you join the table however only put five dollars on the passline and one dollar on one of the 2, three, 11, or twelve. If it wins, fantastic, if it loses press to $2. If it does not win again, press to four dollars and then to $8, then to sixteen dollars and after that add a $1.00 every time. Each instance you don’t win, bet the last amount plus a further dollar.

Employing this system, if for example after fifteen rolls, the number you bet on (11) has not been tosses, you really should march away. However, this is what might happen.

On the tenth roll, you have a total of one hundred and twenty six dollars in the game and the YO finally hits, you gain three hundred and fifteen dollars with a take of one hundred and eighty nine dollars. Now is a perfect time to walk away as it is higher than what you joined the table with.

If the YO doesn’t hit until the 20th roll, you will have a complete investment of $391 and seeing as current action is at $31, you earn $465 with your take of $74.

As you can see, using this scheme with just a $1.00 "press," your profit margin becomes smaller the more you bet on without succeeding. That is why you should march away once you have won or you have to bet a "full press" again and then continue on with the one dollar mark up with each hand.

Crunch the data at home before you try this so you are very adept at when this system becomes a non-winning proposition instead of a profitable one.